1918 Shahy Issue

If you have comments/additions/corrections, please post them HERE
Additional Quality Images would be welcome.
Click on images for a larger picture

After Ukraine declared its independence on January 22, 1918, artists Antin Sereda and Heorhii Narbut were assigned to design the first stamps of the newly independent republic.
The first “stamps” were printed on card stock, not onto paper to be used as money-tokens (18.04.1918).
Although they resembled regular stamps and were perforated 11.5, the heavier card stock made them more durable.
Their size was 26 X 31mm
They were used in place of coins, as a metal shortage prevented the Ukrainian government from creating any coins.
The back had an inscription that read “On par with coins”
Some were used as postage and such covers are rare.
Three months later, on July 18, 1918, these same designs were printed onto thin white paper to create Ukraine’s first postage stamps.
Their size was 24.5 X 29mm.
Catalogs list a perf 11.5  at 10-15X value of the imperforate.

Although these stamps are relatively common, they were forged in great quantities.
There is only one set of forgeries of the shahiv issue and that is found in a sheet printing of 12 by 7.
The easiest way to identify forgeries is to examine the paper. Instead of using thin, white paper, the forgeries were printed on thin, shiny, light brown, semi-transparent paper somewhat like glassine paper.
They are about 0.5mm smaller on both sides.
It appears they may only be without gum.
NOTE – as the original dies wore out, the distinction between genuine and forgery becomes more difficult.

Genuine and forgery comparisons
Genuine left, forgery right.


The Forgery:
The lines on the left petal are coarse and not parallel.
The flower on the right is not shaded in.
The top letters are thinner.
The dots above the I are smaller.
The central diamond is not filled in – some genuine stamps are only partially filled in.

Forgery on different paper & colour

Genuine with forged cancel – very common

A block of forgeries from a catalog


The forgery:
The end of the mustache touches the lines of shading.
The lines inside the 20 are shaped differently.
The trident has a broken section.
The letters are different. The b & K are noticeably inclined.

A partial sheet of forgeries

A block of forgeries from a catalog


The forgery:
The shading on the neck is irregular. One section protrudes left.
The bottom letters are thinner and the serifs lack curls.
The nostril is generally a small dash.

A block of forgeries from a catalog

A genuine from a worn plate
Originals from the first printing are rare and command a much higher CV.


The forgery:
The letters in the second row are not aligned.
The I is noticeably inclined.
The K is not a smooth curve and the right leg is thin.

A block of forgeries from a catalog

Color variations.
All the issues have variations as inks were mixed for each new printing.


Forgery right
The main differences are in the letter, particularly the last one which has a distinct slope.
note also the faint guide lines

A block of forgeries from a catalog

Comparison of an early and late printing.

A genuine block

The Currency Issue
I will not spend much time on this as these stamps are technically not philatelic in nature but numismatic. They generally are found on currency auctions.
As well, it was far more profitable for forgers to produce currency stamps rather than packet trade ones.
The 40sh and 50sh were obviously the main targets. The 40sh has about 6 known forgeries, the 50sh has over 40
The following are genuine to the best of my knowledge

The forgeries of these stamps are often crude and it is relatively easy to compare with the genuine article.

A 50sh forgery – note in particular how the frame of the posthorns is different from the genuine. There are also differences in the letters on the reverse.