Forgeries of Uruguay
The genuine traits are fairly consistent for all 3 due to;
The 80c values were made from the 35 stones of the 60c by removing the ’60’, this gives rise to 35 different minor varieties of the 80 c. The 1 real stamp was also made in this way, except that the whole bottom label was removed and replaced by the 1 real text, this also gives rise to 35 minor varieties.
So there lies a major problem, the 1 Real has 35 varieties
Above, color shades of the 1856 issue
Aside from all the easy to catch forgeries there are the Sperati’s
Sperati made several forgeries of these stamps, three of the 60 c, two of the 80 c and three of the 1 r values.
Uruguay was one of his favorite countries and he took extra care in making these forgeries.
The 60 & 80 have some definite Sperati traits, the best of the 1R is near perfect.
All the dozen or more traits of the genuine are in the Sperati 1R.
To really check the early Uruguay stamps one would need a good forgery guide and a plating guide.
Possibly the best are;
The Postage Stamps of Uruguay E.J. Lee 1931
‘Estudio de las Falsificaciones de los Sellos Postales del Uruguay’ Robert Hoffmann 1948
These are forged in great numbers
The 60c has at least 12 variations of the first type and 3 of the 2nd
The 80c has 4
The 1r has 5
I feel comfortable that these are genuine
Probably by far the most forged set in Uruguay.
The majority of stamps on general auctions I looked appeared to be counterfeits.
The 120c has at least 8 known forgery varieties
The 180c has 6
The 240c has 10
Seranne Type F
“M” far from frame corner
Large opening in the “O”
Small shaded dots
“S”not touching the upper frame and no hump below it
Upward tail on “2”
Thin “1” with serif
Dash between eyes
Eyes looking left
Dent on side of chin
Sperati reproduction ‘D’ of the 240 c value. Above the ‘V’ of ‘MONTEVIDEO’ a large red dot in the white frameline can be found.
Fournier Seranne Type G
Some unknown forgers
Left, Small dots
“S” small and not connected to frame
“1” too far right and small serif
Right, probably an excellent forgery as only the face does not appear to match the genuine version.
Also the “8” crosses the bottom lin
Catalogs make few mentions of these forgeries but I found them to be both prolific and in many cases very dangerous.
The known forgeries in the thin numerals are;
60c, 5; 80c, 4; 100c, 3; 120c, 4; 180c, 5; 240c, 6
In the thick numerals
60c, 8; 80c, 5; 100c, 4; 120c, 3; 180c, 8 – there is possibly none of the 240c
Genuine Issues – Thin series
1. The circle is not in the center, it is slightly to the left and down.
2. Ray lines up with back of “E”
3. Bottom leg of the “E’s” longer than the top.
4. The rays do not touch the circle frame at the top.
5. The corner elements are all proportional.
6. The tear drop shapes point to the center of the flower elements. The right ones are shorter than the left ones.
7. “CORREO” on the right is longer than on the left, about 9.25mm vs. 8.25mm
8. The rays are made up of alternating straight and wavy lines.
9. The width on the right is ~3mm, on the left ~2.5mm
10. The “S” slants left and is 1mm from the end of the shaded frame.
11. There is a separating line about 2mm from outside frame.
12. There is an accent on the “E” and in the thin series generally does not touch the “E”
13. There are 2 breaks in the frame line.
14. The ray lines up with the center of the “N”.
15. Generally a dash is visible in these shapes.
16. This ray lines up with the back of the “R”.
17. This particular ray ends in a dot
Note that given the varieties, not all issues have all these genuine traits
There are many Classic Types which may help in their identification.
This LINK is a Spanish listing of these types
Others of the thin series
The traits of the Thin Numeral all apply plus,
1. The “N & T” are joined
2. The “I & M” are joined
3. The accent over the “E” is longer and generally touches the “E”
4. The “R & E” are joined
5. The top of the “M” has a long dash
The initial printings are generally clearer than the Thin Numerals.
Others of the thick series
The corner elements are squarish in shape instead of the definite petals of the genuine.
Center circles are more centered
The 180 has a slanted “8” & the top right drop shape is missing
Many letters do not match the originals.
These require quite close attention as they are quite good.
Sperati made copies of every issue both thin & thick
I have not identified the forger of these copies.
I have seen a notation that they are Sperati copies, if so they would not be his A group.
They all have a dash on the left cheek and the tear drops are very white. There are many issues with the letters and the numerals as well (note the “S” position).
Some unknown crude forgeries
1864 Coat of Arms Issue
What to look for
1. Dent on top of the C
2. RI joined together
3. White spot above the OS
4. Bottom of the I is weak
5. Accent above the E
6. The E is smaller than the C & N
7. The banner protrudes from the frame on the left side
There are 7 types of this stamp based primarily on the distance between the 06 and the C
Genuine left, Spiro forgery a right (note missing accent on the “E”), “R I E” not joined.
The face is very different and is a common issue with many of the forgeries.
This forgery is very common and there are about 8 different varieties
In almost all cases the forger has made errors in the sun shape and rays as well as the value and the letters of CENTESIMOS
The forgery on the right is a more dangerous one that frequently shows up on auction sites. Possibly a Sperati
The broken frame is typical
Close examination of the letters shows they are not as uniform as the genuine right
1866-68 Numerals – there were 3 printings of these
Genuine left, forgery right note the mountain and background lines, “CORREOS” poorly done & too small.
The above is a Type I
The Type II looks more like the genuine. The middle stroke of the “E” in “REPUBLICA” is very crooked. The “I” in the same word is much shorter than the other letters. The “L” has a thick base.
The Type III has no accent on the “U” of “REPUBLICA” and all the letters are much shorter than the original.
Proof left, forgery right, note “RE” looks like “HE”, serif on “M”, small last “O”
The background letters are very irregular. Note the shape and where the subject is looking.
All these numerals are extensively forged.
Some, especially the 15, are very dangerous so care must be taken.
The stamps of the series are numbered from 1 – 100
As a result, collectors are searching for the missing numbers to create a full plating.
Forgers have seized an opportunity.
The ”1” is thicker at the base
The numerals that go from 1 to 100 are much thinner
The 2c forgery has a color dot top left of the “1882”, see below. I am not aware if the 1C has this feature.
The rays near the white space around the irregular and narrow head is heavily shaded
Lower part of the face is disfigured by dots and colored lines
Small dot of color above the right eye
This series was reprinted between 1894-1909 in different colors
The Forgery (General characteristics)
The reprints have their own forgeries.
The horizontal top bar of the 2nd “E” in “CENTESIMOS” is long and crudely done
The right leg of the “M” in “CENTESIMOS” is taller than the left one.
The “5” in “25” ends in a long point and has many dots.
The right leg of the “U” in “URUGUAY” is much longer than the first one
“REPUBLICA” has no accent on the “U”
1897 La Paz issue
1904 Paz issue
1905 Corriente series
1906 National shield another postal forgery
Forgeries of the 5c issue exist in 3 different types and are fairly common
Type 1 has a triangular white spot below the “EN” of “CENTENSIMOS”
Type II has a white round stain underneath “L” of “ORIENTAL”
Type III has a white and irregular spot, entering the back of the cow, below the “U”
1908 Independence Commemorative
It is grey-green instead of dark green. It is dull and the forward funnel is broken at the base.
The spar of the tall mast of the ship far left has a bend in it towards the bottom.
Ragged lines encircling the numeral and the water is different
It appears that there may be 2 different sets of forgeries as shown in the group below – click for full image.
1913 Overprint – Cent. of the Buenos Aires Congress of 1813.
Genuine left, forgery right
Note in particular the difference in the C’s, the size of the last line and the symbol above the N.
There are also much better forgeries that require very close scrutiny.
Most inverts offered on auctions are fakes.
1925 Airmail – circulation was under 4,000 so pricey and lots of forgeries
Forgeries – very well done, look for small details like the toes in feet which are joined.
No watermark, perf 10.5 x 12.5
In “FLORIDA” – the “S” is different
In “MONTEVIDEO” the serif on the “M” and the lack of separation between the “D & E”
This is a long series and all the values were forged.
Left genuine, right forgery, may originate from Belgium, excellent other than the notch in the wing.
Forgeries have no watermark. The colors will vary from the originals.
In the name “SCASSO” there is a dot above the last “S” which is missing in the forgeries
There are deceptive forgeries with no notch in the wing.
Look for minor details like the shape of the head, the inclination of the accent on the “E” of “AEREO”, the straight 4 small dashes in the body instead of being curved and the details above.
Here is another forged value